English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-06-05 (16:59)
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier+lists.caml/news/@r...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Rogoff <bpr@best.com> writes:
> regardless. Coming back to the subject of this thread, in an ideal world, 
> there wouldn't be a need to distinguish between Bigarray and Array, you'd 
> just use polymorphic arrays and the compiler would be smart enough to 
> always get unboxed and tag free element representations. Supposedly Stalin 

That's also what SML/NJ tries to do.  But short of doing whole program
analysis and/or profiling feedback, it's difficult to generate as good
code as in the Bigarray case.

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr