Browse thread
[Caml-list] OCaml Speed for Block Convolutions
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris Hecker <checker@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Currying in Ocaml |
Let's start up the commuting labels discussion again!!! Ahem. I think you have to eta-expand: (fun t d -> print_all d t) I don't think there's a flip f x y = f y x in the pervasives library (why not, by the way, INRIA folks?), but it seems to be a common idiom, like fst and snd. As for overhead, "Assume Nothing," as they say. Try eta-expanding and let us know if you see a performance problem. Chris At 10:20 AM 6/8/01 +1000, Mark Wotton wrote: >Is it possible to curry on arbitrary parameters in Ocaml, or is it >strictly left to right? I have a function "print_all depth tree" and >sometimes I'd like to curry on depth, other times on tree. I see that if i >write a little wrapper like "rev_curry_print_all tree depth = print_all >depth tree" I could curry using that instead, but this function is called >inside a deep recursive loop and I'm worried that I'll get an unnecessary >function call overhead. Is there a better way of doing this? > >regards, >Mark > > >------------------- >Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ >To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr