Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Fox <dsf@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity |
To follow up on my previous post, which hasn't shown up here yet, the advantage of a really popular language is that the libraries have been thoroughly hammered by users. In contrast, there are quite a few libraries for Ocaml, but typically I pick one up and start using it and quickly run into bugs. Any feature the author isn't using is likely to need work. This is somewhat annoying to me, and quite disconcerting to a less experienced programmer. I'm just saying that popularity is a good thing for a programming language. ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr