Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Evaluation Order
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David McClain <dmcclain1@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Evaluation Order
> The specification that indicates temporal preference is
>         let <first> in let <second> in ...
> Argument evaluation order and temporal preference are two orthogonal
concepts and should not be conflated.  I support unspecified argument
evaluation order.

I agree with you, but you have proposed effectively doing nothing. There is
no safeguard to prevent someone bypassing this syntax by accident.

- DM

Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: