Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Evaluation Order
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David McClain <dmcclain1@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Evaluation Order
> The specification that indicates temporal preference is
>
>         let <first> in let <second> in ...
>
> Argument evaluation order and temporal preference are two orthogonal
concepts and should not be conflated.  I support unspecified argument
evaluation order.

I agree with you, but you have proposed effectively doing nothing. There is
no safeguard to prevent someone bypassing this syntax by accident.

- DM


-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr