Browse thread
[Caml-list] Evaluation Order
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David McClain <dmcclain1@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Evaluation Order |
> The specification that indicates temporal preference is > > let <first> in let <second> in ... > > Argument evaluation order and temporal preference are two orthogonal concepts and should not be conflated. I support unspecified argument evaluation order. I agree with you, but you have proposed effectively doing nothing. There is no safeguard to prevent someone bypassing this syntax by accident. - DM ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr