Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] New to OCaml: can someone explain how this code can be done better?
- Jeremy Fincher
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jeremy Fincher <tweedgeezer@h...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] New to OCaml: can someone explain how this code can be done better? |
Thanks! Going through and understanding your code helped me a lot, and was
a terrific aid in seeing the functional (rather than imperative) way of
looping. One question, though:
> let explode string =
> let rec loop i acc =
> if i = 0 then acc
> else let i' = i-1 in loop i' (string.[i'] :: acc)
> in
> loop (String.length string) []
Could this be rewritten as this, to remove the if/else? --
let explode string =
let rec loop acc = function
| 0 -> acc
| i -> loop (string.[i-1] :: acc) (i-1)
in
loop [] (String.length string)
Thanks for your excellent examples.
Jeremy
>
> let implode list =
> let string = String.create (List.length list) in
> let rec loop i = function
> | x :: rest -> string.[i] <- x; loop (i+1) rest
> | [] -> ()
> in
> loop 0 list;
> string
>
> let permute_string s =
> List.map implode (permute (explode s))
>
>(* Eric Cooper, ecc@cmu.edu *)
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr