Browse thread
[Caml-list] native threads not parallel?
- Markus Mottl
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <mottl@m...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] native threads not parallel? |
Hello,
I am having problems using native threads (under Solaris; don't know
about other architectures): I can't get them to run in parallel on a
dual-processor machine even though I turn off the master lock on the
C-side around an external function that should execute in parallel.
There are four threads running (I actually create two only - ?) as I can
observe with "ps -L". The two created ones reach the external Fortran
routine (in LAPACK) at about the same time, obviously in parallel or at
least interleaved up this point as I can see in the logged checkpoints.
I turn off/on the lock around this routine as in:
enter_blocking_section();
some_really_expensive_function ();
leave_blocking_section();
Unfortunately, the expensive function is executed sequentially only.
What could be the cause of the lack of parallelism? Am I just
misunderstanding how things work? If this could be a bug, I can send
you more information to the bug-tracker, of course.
Regards,
Markus Mottl
--
Markus Mottl, mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at, http://miss.wu-wien.ac.at/~mottl
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr