Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml complexity
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity |
wester@ilt.fhg.de wrote: > Those who are content with getting by with a small subset of a language > probably don't like programming and so will not be willing to learn a new > language. I find that a strange comment. I know C++ pretty well, but I only use a subset of it. Indeed, I claim that this is _because_ I know it so well. Preferably, the empty subset :-) I use a subset of Ocaml for a different reason: the subset seems adequate for what I need, and I don't understand some of the higher level constructions well enough to rely on them. In this case, I'd love to learn more .. which is why I read this list :-) -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr