Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Mark Wotton <mrak@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity |
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 leary@nwlink.com wrote: > Excellent points, and I'm inclined to agree, but I'd like to actually be > able to someday get a job using OCaml, ML, et al. :) > > Search on DICE.com... out of 70000+ jobs nationwide (USA): > > caml 0 > sml 19 (apparently none mean Standard Meta Language, so really: 0 ) > haskell 6 > lisp 16 > python 146 > PHP 155 > smalltalk 231 > perl 426* > java 10339 > C++ 18638 > > * probably safe to add in most of the 743 unix system admin jobs, plus some > other portion of the 926 unix quality assurance jobs. > > I may as well try to get a programming job using Latin. I suspect many of the jobs done with Ocaml occur when the customer doesn't really care how the system is implemented as long as it works. I guess the reason this doesn't happen more often is a self-reinforcing one: if the system ever needs maintenance, the customer's unlikely to be happy about it being in a "marginal" language. Mark ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr