Browse thread
[Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Rogoff <bpr@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline |
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Sven LUTHER wrote: > In the end the ledit option seems the more attractive, being written in ocaml > and all. I would love to have it included in the base ocaml tarball. I agree, but that would also mean having CamlP4 in the base ocaml tarball. That isn't a complaint, I'd be perfectly happy with CamlP4 in there. Keeping the size of that tarball down ceased being an issue with me since 2.99/3.0 or thereabouts, when the gzipped tarball became slightly bigger than a double density floppy. And besides, I like P4 and Revised. -- Brian ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr