Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml libs as rpms and ocaml-gd
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | dsf@f... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml libs as rpms and ocaml-gd |
John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au> writes: > Markus Mottl wrote: > > > What do the CDK-maintainers > > think? Such a contribution would surely be very helpful for Linux-users > > who don't want to build things from source. > > There's a difference though: building C/C++ is complex > and error prone. Building Ocaml code is a breeze, at least > for the optimising compiler. Only if you've got an ocaml compiler and a C compiler. In any case, building software from source is invariably more difficult than not building it. Maybe I'm getting old, but I certainly don't want to build any software I could install in binary form. ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr