Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: John Max Skaller <skaller@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info
"Alexander V. Voinov" wrote:

> And in general, redundancy is certainly not an ontological evil when it
> is properly structured. Otherwise we wouldn't make any use of poetry.

	More generally, we know that Ocaml ISN'T properly
structured. If we knew it were, there'd be no point doing research :-)

John (Max) Skaller, 
10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850
New generation programming language Felix
Literate Programming tool Interscript
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: