Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info
-
Krishnaswami, Neel
- Brian Rogoff
- Markus Mottl
-
John Max Skaller
-
Alexander V. Voinov
- John Max Skaller
-
Alexander V. Voinov
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info |
"Alexander V. Voinov" wrote: > And in general, redundancy is certainly not an ontological evil when it > is properly structured. Otherwise we wouldn't make any use of poetry. More generally, we know that Ocaml ISN'T properly structured. If we knew it were, there'd be no point doing research :-) -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 New generation programming language Felix http://felix.sourceforge.net Literate Programming tool Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr