[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Krishnaswami, Neel <neelk@c...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Ints and overflow... |
Hello, I need a really fast pseudo-rng (quality is second to speed) and decided to implement a linear congruential generator, since they are really simple and there are literally reams of papers describing good parameter choices. However, this has led me directly into the zone of integer overflow. Basically, I don't understand what I can expect to be portable, and I really don't understand what OCaml does -- what is the tagging scheme, and how does that affect the overflow results I can expect? For example: Is the integer tag 0 or 1? Does it vary by platform? Can the results vary by how Caml chooses to optimize adds? Does Caml promise anything at all about the results of an overflowing integer add? Each of these seems quite simple but the sum total leaves me quite lost. I would be very grateful if someone could relieve my confusion. -- Neel Krishnaswami neelk@cswcasa.com ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr