Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] a reckless proposal
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Miles Egan <miles@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] a reckless proposal
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:47:51AM -0700, Brian Rogoff wrote:
> section 4.5 explains it. 
> Maybe a few more paragraphs showing how to use module types, functors, and
> top level modules in a smallish compiled program would help? 

Right.  A bit more elaboration there might help.
> > Perhaps some kind of "Ocaml for Java Programmers" FAQ might be useful?
> I don't use Java enough that it's the source of false friends. Are you
> volunteering?

Thankfully, neither do I anymore.  I think it's an issue for C, C++, and Python
programmers as well, though.  I'd be happy to work on a FAQ if I'm not the only
one that thinks it might be productive.


"We in the past evade X, where X is something which we believe to be a
lion, through the act of running." -
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: