Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: "Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Krishnaswami, Neel <neelk@c...>
Subject: Re: "Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info
Sven [] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:21:02PM -0400, Krishnaswami, Neel wrote:
> > 
> > Can you describe how I'd write something like the show function in 
> > Haskell, or the print-object generic function in Dylan? I've looked
> > at the G'Caml documentation, and it doesn't look like it's possible
> > to extend a generic function with new branches.
> i think they are speacking about an extension to g'caml that 
> would use the include keyword and permit such extension.
> Please read the previous mails about this thread.

Ah, I misunderstood, then. I thought the claim was that include 
wouldn't be included, but that it wasn't necessary. 

Neel Krishnaswami
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: