Browse thread
Re: "Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info
- Krishnaswami, Neel
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-07-11 (14:27) |
From: | Krishnaswami, Neel <neelk@c...> |
Subject: | Re: "Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info |
Sven [mailto:luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr] wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:21:02PM -0400, Krishnaswami, Neel wrote: > > > > Can you describe how I'd write something like the show function in > > Haskell, or the print-object generic function in Dylan? I've looked > > at the G'Caml documentation, and it doesn't look like it's possible > > to extend a generic function with new branches. > > i think they are speacking about an extension to g'caml that > would use the include keyword and permit such extension. > Please read the previous mails about this thread. Ah, I misunderstood, then. I thought the claim was that include wouldn't be included, but that it wasn't necessary. -- Neel Krishnaswami neelk@cswcasa.com ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr