Sven [mailto:luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:21:02PM -0400, Krishnaswami, Neel wrote:
> > 
> > Can you describe how I'd write something like the show function in 
> > Haskell, or the print-object generic function in Dylan? I've looked
> > at the G'Caml documentation, and it doesn't look like it's possible
> > to extend a generic function with new branches.
> 
> i think they are speacking about an extension to g'caml that 
> would use the include keyword and permit such extension.
> Please read the previous mails about this thread.

Ah, I misunderstood, then. I thought the claim was that include 
wouldn't be included, but that it wasn't necessary. 


--
Neel Krishnaswami
neelk@cswcasa.com
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr