Browse thread
[Caml-list] Fully qualified polymorphic variants
-
Sami Nopanen
- Jacques Garrigue
- Markus Mottl
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Markus Mottl <markus@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Fully qualified polymorphic variants |
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Sami Nopanen wrote: > I've been trying to use polymorphic variants with fully qualified names, > with no luck. Simple answer: you don't need fully qualified names! That's the idea behind polymorphic variants that they have the same representation no matter where they are used. They need not (cannot) be defined in a type definition, which also means that you need not (cannot) refer to them via module paths. Regards, Markus Mottl -- Markus Mottl markus@oefai.at Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence http://www.oefai.at/~markus ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr