Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] a reckless proposal
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Sven <luther@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] a reckless proposal
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:08:17AM -0700, Miles Egan wrote:
> This approach has, in my mind, two advantages:
> 1. The object system becomes more generally useful.
> 2. A confusing and non-orthogonal feature of ocaml is subsumed into
>    another, more generally useful and flexible feature.

But object are more heavyweight than plain record, which are, if i am not wrong,
just named tuples.


Sven Luter
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: