Browse thread
[Caml-list] a reckless proposal
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Sven <luther@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] a reckless proposal |
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:08:17AM -0700, Miles Egan wrote: > This approach has, in my mind, two advantages: > 1. The object system becomes more generally useful. > 2. A confusing and non-orthogonal feature of ocaml is subsumed into > another, more generally useful and flexible feature. But object are more heavyweight than plain record, which are, if i am not wrong, just named tuples. Friendly, Sven Luter ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr