[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Krishnaswami, Neel <neelk@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: "Re: [Caml-list] A G'Caml question" + additional info |
Patrick M Doane [mailto:patrick@watson.org] wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Brian Rogoff wrote: > > > I'm convinced that the include scheme, when properly integrated with > > modules, will be sufficient. We need more experience with > > the current scheme. > > I'm convinced now too, it took me a day or two to think things over to > come to the same conclusion. Can you describe how I'd write something like the show function in Haskell, or the print-object generic function in Dylan? I've looked at the G'Caml documentation, and it doesn't look like it's possible to extend a generic function with new branches. -- Neel Krishnaswami neelk@cswcasa.com ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr