Markus Mottl [mailto:markus@mail4.ai.univie.ac.at] wrote:
> 
> 
> Development of "social tools" would certainly be very beneficial for
> industrial use: fewer hassles for employed programmers, more available
> software, potentially more OCaml-programmers that can be hired, etc.
> I don't think it would be terribly expensive to let somebody 
> do it. The Consortium should be very interested in funding such efforts.

Speaking of social tools, I've noticed that a lot of OCaml packages
all have TeX documentation with a certain common style. Are those
style files available publically anywhere, and if so, could someone
point me to them? I've held off contributing some packages because 
I don't want to write documentation that "looks wrong". 

--
Neel Krishnaswami
neelk@cswcasa.com
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr