Browse thread
[Caml-list] Segfault in a native code multi-threaded program
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Max Skaller <skaller@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Segfault in a native code multi-threaded program |
> <hint for next ocaml ;)> > > It would be very nice to be able to rely on Marshal as safely as on > ocaml typing. Just to be sure that if I expect an int * string, I will > effectively receive an int * string or raise an exception. It could > probably be done using the same tricks as used in printf formatters. > > </hint for next ocaml ;)> As I understand it, this is a non-trivial research problem. -- John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 New generation programming language Felix http://felix.sourceforge.net Literate Programming tool Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr