[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Mentre <David.Mentre@i...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Thread and sockets |
Hello,
I'm building a Caml client/server program using posix threads and
sockets. Right now, I have 3 threads:
1. normal thread for user computation
2. a thread doing a blocking call to Unix.accept to setup new
connections
3. a thread doing a blocking call to Thread.select (with infinite
timeout) to get messages on opened connections
I've observed that my design is bad and I have several race
conditions. Worse problems are when I open and close connections. For
example, if thread (3) is blocked and a new connection is opened by
thread (2), thread (3) won't read new messages. I have similar problems
when sockets are closed. How to do it properly?
I think I should open a dedicated thread for each new socket [1].
However I don't know how to stop a thread waiting inside a blocking
call. What happens if the remote part close the socket where a thread is
doing a select (or a read). Does this thread get an exception?
I also don't know how to stop cleanly thread (2). Should another thread
close the socket where thread (2) is doing an Unix.accept on?
I would accept with pleasure any advice on this subjet.
Best regards,
david
[1] At first, I did not choose this design to avoid creating zillions of
new posix (i.e. kernel, on Linux) threads.
--
David.Mentre@inria.fr
Opinions expressed here are only mine.
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr