Browse thread
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Hendrik Tews <tews@t...> |
| Subject: | empty type (was [Caml-list] Please help a newbie) |
In Ocaml, the categorical initial also exists, thanks to polymorphic variants: type void = [] It is my contention that the type of procedures is wrong in ocaml precisely because they return unit, when they _should_ be returning void (that is, nothing). So what typing rules do you use for the empty type? Usually a type theory is inconsistent as soon as one has an inhabitant of the empty type. Bye, Hendrik ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr