Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Confusion about camlidl capabilities? other tools?
- Jeff Henrikson
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jeff Henrikson <jehenrik@y...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Confusion about camlidl capabilities? other tools? |
> I started working some time ago on c2caml, which, altough maybe not > what you need, was intented to generate ocaml stubs from C header > code, particularly for parsing the gtk+ headers and generating > appropriate bndings. It is really jus ta C parser for now, but if > you want, you can look at it, it is availabel in the CDK, i think. No, wrong way. I want to publish a control implemented in caml to the outside world. Parsing C is not involved. Printing a bunch of C is. Note that this is easier than the reverse: C header files are underspecified and need a markup language (MIDL, SWIG) to make stub generation well defined. mli files on the other hand have everything you need to interface to C or something else. Jeff Henrikson > -----Original Message----- > From: Sven [mailto:luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr] > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 4:53 PM > To: Jeff Henrikson > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Confusion about camlidl capabilities? other > tools? > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 03:26:46PM -0400, Jeff Henrikson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Reading the documentation of camlidl, it says that caml objects can be exported for use in C/C++ programs. Looking at > the source > > code, the support for this looks minimal. I see the camlidldll script, which is just a shell script that links a caml > program with > > some executable code. If this is some sort of automatic dispatch interface generator, this is not what I want. I want real C > > header files from just plain unannotated mli. Preferably a system with ability to map variants into C struct/unions > coupled with > > utility functions. I'm not sure which other advanced ocaml datatypes I need beyond variants and the basic ints, > strings, arrays > > and etc. > > > > Has anybody done something like this? I ripped out the ocaml parser and started playing with it to build a tool, but > I don't want > > to be reinventing the wheel. While I'm at it, I will probably try to export stubs at least these styles: COM, > GTK-style C objects, > > and SWIG-ready header files for inclusion in Python or TCL or whatever some unenlightened person would want to use. > > I started working some time ago on c2caml, which, altough maybe not what you > need, was intented to generate ocaml stubs from C header code, particularly > for parsing the gtk+ headers and generating appropriate bndings. It is really > jus ta C parser for now, but if you want, you can look at it, it is availabel > in the CDK, i think. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr