Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] function type confusion (using let)
- FALCON Gilles FTRD/DTL/LAN
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-09-03 (09:34) |
From: | FALCON Gilles FTRD/DTL/LAN <gilles.falcon@r...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] function type confusion (using let) |
-----Message d'origine----- De : Laurent Chéno [mailto:laurent.cheno@noos.fr] Envoyé : lundi 3 septembre 2001 07:55 À : Michael Leary Cc : Caml-list Objet : Re: [Caml-list] function type confusion (using let) (* please excuse my poor english *) > I was trying to be clever about not using ;; and minimizing my use of ; > in > files, and I've gone off the deep end... > > Why is this wrong, and how do I fix it?: > > let pi = 3.14159 > let pi2 = 2.0 *. pi > > let normr r = > let x = mod_float r pi2 in > if x > 0.0 then > if x > pi then > -.pi2 +. x > else > x > else if x < 0.0 then ^ this "then" has no else ! > if x < -.pi then (* <------ here *) > pi2 +. x > else > x ... else ?? You have forgotten the "else" clause : if <cond> then <expr> has type : unit if <cond> then <float-expr> else <float-expr> has type : float ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr