>>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:06:10 +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr> said:

> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 06:58:59AM -0400, Dave Mason wrote:
>> I want to re-iterate this.  I have several 10's of lines of caml
>> code, and probably 1/2 of the programs I write use the [< >]
>> parsing.

> And what is the problem?

Sorry, should have said 10's of *thousands* of lines.

> The point is *not* to remove streams!!!! Streams and their LL1
> parsers remain!!! I just ask people to preprocess by "-pp
> camlp4o". Is that so complicated? Are you allergic to my program?

Please don't get defensive, I'm not meaning to attack you!

You omitted the part of my original email where I said that I honestly
don't know how easy it is to use this through camlp4o.  If it's
trivial (i.e. just add ``-pp camlp4o''), I don't understand why it
won't be the default, and if it's not trivial, I (and several other
people) will be unhappy.

I get the sense, from your apparent upset, that it really is that trivial.

Thanks	../Dave
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr