[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-09-11 (18:54) |
From: | Krishnaswami, Neel <neelk@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Style question |
Brian Rogoff [mailto:bpr@best.com] wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Andreas Rossberg wrote: > > > > My personal opinion is that using modules is preferable even in SML, > > its local being an anachronism from the pre-module days, just like > > abstype. I almost never use it. It only comes in handy in conjunction > > with open: > > Right, but I assume you know the workaround, since you decribe it in a > followup, and I assume you've read this page > > http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~rossberg/SMLvsOcaml.html > > I just wish the author would update the section on localdecs > to mention using modules instead of local open :-) Is this a subtle joke that I'm missing? Andreas Rossberg *wrote* that page! -- Neel Krishnaswami neelk@cswcasa.com ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr