English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Style question
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-09-11 (18:54)
From: Krishnaswami, Neel <neelk@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Style question
Brian Rogoff [mailto:bpr@best.com] wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> > 
> > My personal opinion is that using modules is preferable even in SML,
> > its local being an anachronism from the pre-module days, just like
> > abstype. I almost never use it. It only comes in handy in conjunction 
> > with open:
> Right, but I assume you know the workaround, since you decribe it in a
> followup, and I assume you've read this page
>   http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~rossberg/SMLvsOcaml.html
> I just wish the author would update the section on localdecs 
> to mention using modules instead of local open :-)

Is this a subtle joke that I'm missing? Andreas Rossberg *wrote* that 

Neel Krishnaswami
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr