Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] findlib and mac os x frameworks/bundles/applications
- Damien Doligez
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-09-28 (13:57) |
From: | Damien Doligez <Damien.Doligez@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] findlib and mac os x frameworks/bundles/applications |
>From: james woodyatt <jhwoodyatt@mac.com> >I've come to the point where I better start caring about how I will go >about deploying my software. My preferred development environment is >Mac OS X, which already has a convention for deploying software >applications, bundles and frameworks. I have no need (or burning >desire) to deploy on any other platforms. >On the other hand, I see Gerd Stolpmann's findlib tool, and I see this >is a popular package management system for Ocaml software. I would say these two distribution formats have very different purposes. Apple's bundles and packages are most useful for easy installation of stand-alone applications. findlib is for managing libraries that are going to be used by programmers. I think you should use an Apple-style package if you're distributing an application targetting the end user (in which case ease of installation is very important), and a findlib package if your product is a library to be used by other programmers (in which case reading the docs and typing a few command lines to a shell prompt is not a big deal). -- Damien ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr