[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Remi VANICAT <vanicat@l...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Haskell features in O'Caml |
Christian.Schaller@cert.siemens.de writes:
> > The correct answer might have been a reference to the module system.
> > You can specify the type of a function either in a separate *.mli-file
> > or in an explicit module declaration:
> >
> > # module M : sig
> > val mul : int -> int -> int
> > end = struct
> > let mul a b = a * b
> > end;;
> > module M : sig val mul : int -> int -> int end
> > # M.mul 2 3;;
> > - : int = 6
> > # module N : sig
> > val mul : int -> int -> int
> > end = struct
> > let mul a b = a *. b (* Arithmetic is monomorphic - no
> > type classes *)
> > end;;
> > Signature mismatch:
> > Modules do not match:
> > [...]
> >
>
> Unfortunately there seems to be a difference between explicit module
> declaration as seen above and the separation of interface and
> implementation.
>
> Since implementation is not automatically checked against the interface
> (or did I get something wrong?),
yes, you do:
test.ml :
let f x = x
test.mli :
val f : int -> float
$ ocamlc -c test.ml
I/O error: test.cmi: No such file or directory
$ ocamlc -c test.mli
$ ocamlc -c test.ml
The implementation test.ml does not match the interface test.cmi:
Values do not match: val f : 'a -> 'a is not included in val f : int -> float
> you just load you implementation (or
> compile it) without using (or compiling) the appropriate interface and there
> will be no complaint about mismatch in signature and structure.
>
> I'd prefer the compiler/desktop automatically look for interface
> definition while compiling/loading.
>
> One more or less off-topic question about interfaces: is there a way to
> see the all what's inside a module when I'm opening it using "open" (like
> "module M : sig val mul : int -> int -> int end" in above example)?
yes :
$ Module T = List
module T :
sig
external length : string -> int = "%string_length"
external get : string -> int -> char = "%string_safe_get"
external set : string -> int -> char -> unit = "%string_safe_set"
[...]
external unsafe_fill : string -> pos:int -> len:int -> char -> unit
= "fill_string" "noalloc"
end
--
Rémi Vanicat
vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr
http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr