[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-10-23 (14:59) |
From: | Pixel <pixel@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] How standalone are ocaml binaries? |
"Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla" <sevillar@team.ph.inter.net> writes: > How standalone are binaries created by ocaml? completly standalone with "ocamlopt" or "ocamlc -custom" (except for the standard C libraries, try ldd) > Will an ocamlrun binary > for system X be sufficient to make an ocaml runtime system for byte > compiled files? yes, everything is included in ocamlrun (the corollary is that if you want things like Unix or Str or any extension, you have to build a custom ocamlrun) The result is quite big binaries, and no possibility to share the common stuff between them: pixel@leia:~>ls -l /usr/bin/unison -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1934396 Oct 5 21:56 /usr/bin/unison For example, is there any way to build a shareable lablgtk? It should be possible to achieve this using lablgtkrun? Would it big possible with binary (ocamlopt)? -- Pixel ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr