Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc
-
Benjamin C. Pierce
- Stefano Lanzavecchia
- Thorsten Ohl
- Patrick M Doane
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-10-10 (15:25) |
From: | Stefano Lanzavecchia <stf@a...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc |
> Is there *anyone* that wants to write > > (* Comment for f *) > val f : t > (* Comment for g *) > val g : t' You mean, anyone who normally, when writing programs, either puts the comment before the thing being commented, or val f : t (* Comment for f *) val g : t' (* Comment for g *) on the same line as the thing being commented? Yes, that's me. I consistently either put the comment on the lines before or on the same line as. If I ever need to put a comment after the thing being commented I use big warnings in my source code listings, to indicate that I am talking about what appears before (read: above) the line containing the comment. WARNING: I am not an OCaml programmer. I program in other languages and only follow this maillist because I'd love to learn enough OCaml to use to solve some of my problems. -- WildHeart'2k1 - mailto:stf@apl.it Homepage: http://come.to/wildheart/ <<<All I Ever Learned, I Learned From Anime: --- All magical swords are as tall, or taller, than the wielder.>>> ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr