Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Patrick M Doane <patrick@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc |
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Benjamin C. Pierce wrote:
> I.e., *one* kind of (not very) funny comment marker, plus using the
> indentation to decide whether the comment binds to the expression before
> or after:
>
> if the comment is on a line by itself,
> then if its indentation is the same as the following (non-comment) line
> then it goes with the following
> else it goes with the preceding
> else it goes with the line it's on.
This proposal looks perfect to me.
I've also noticed in the manual that all of the multi-line comment
examples are like this:
(** line 1
line 2
line 3 *)
Will there be any issues with writing comments like this?
(** line 1
* line 2
* line 3
*)
Patrick
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr