Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Francois Pottier <francois.pottier@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:10:16PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > I think that the above rules match rather closely what most people > write anyway. A documentation tool is based on conventions, as visual > as possible (you want to read the comments in the source too). True, but using indentation for this purpose will make life more difficult for tools that must pretty-print code (such as camlp4), won't it? -- François Pottier Francois.Pottier@inria.fr http://pauillac.inria.fr/~fpottier/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr