Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc
- Benjamin C. Pierce
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2001-10-09 (12:14) |
From: | Benjamin C. Pierce <bcpierce@s...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc |
> How about a variation on Jerome's suggestion: > > - The comment is before the element: > (*> fun 1 *) > val f : t > (*> fun 2 *) > val g : u > - The comment is after the element: > val f : t > (*< fun 1 *) > val g : u > (*< fun 2 *) Let me enter a plea here for *not* introducing a dozen different kinds of funny markers in comments. One of the nice features of the original proposal was that it doesn't uglify the source code very much -- please let's keep that. For the record, I like Jerome's idea of using just indentation to figure out which comment goes with which declaration. B ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr