Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-10-10 (15:36)
From: Thorsten Ohl <ohl@h...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc
> Is there *anyone* that wants to write
>       (* Comment for f *)
>   val f : t
>       (* Comment for f *)
>   val g : t'

I do.  Does this mean that I should find some professional help?

Seriously, I have formed this habit, because I've written almost all
my code in the last decade with noweb or other literate pogramming
tools derived from Don Knuth's WEB.  These encourage to write
documentation before the corresponding code and I've kept this habit
for signatures as well.
Thorsten Ohl, Physics Department, TU Darmstadt -- [<=== PGP public key here]
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: