Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Whither the Caml Consortium?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-10-25 (09:54)
From: Frank Atanassow <franka@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Whither the Caml Consortium?
Rolf Wester wrote (on 23-10-01 15:41 +0200):
> But even if you have a killer-app written in OCaml you will still have to explain 
> to your manager (and even more your colleagues) why you would not have 
> been able to write this app in C++ or Java (or why it would have been much
> more effort to do it in another language). I think that because competing 
> languages are advertised with buzzwords and their list of "advantages" 
> OCaml should be advertised too. OCaml's features should be compared to 
> other languages and statements made concerning other languages should 
> objectively be analyzed and criticized. And if for a certain kind of application
> another language is more suitable this should also be clearly stated. I think
> this could help those who are looking for an alternative to the main stream
> languages and those who have to argue in favour of using OCaml.  

Not that I want to become embroiled in a discussion on the finer points of
propaganda---oops, `advocacy', but you can find such a buzzword list here:

and here (for SML, but all the points still hold except the last two):

Suitable for pointing your colleague to, if (s)he wants to know what (CA)ML is
all about.

Frank Atanassow, Information & Computing Sciences, Utrecht University
Padualaan 14, PO Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
Tel +31 (030) 253-3261 Fax +31 (030) 251-379
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: