English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Whither the Caml Consortium?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-10-25 (18:42)
From: Michel Mauny <Michel.Mauny@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Whither the Caml Consortium?
Joshua D. Guttman wrote/écrivait (Oct 24 2001, 01:35PM -0400):

> For people like me, it would be good to have a level of consortium
> membership that a single project could justify.  If there was
> something in the three figure range (i.e. hundreds but not thousands
> of dollars), I would simply make the arrangements and I'd never have
> to convince anyone organizationally very distant from me.  But for a
> consortium membership that costs thousands, I would have to convince
> people I rarely interact with, and they would want to decide whether
> OCaml should play some company-wide role, and probably it would be a
> dead end.
> Would the OCaml Consortium consider something like this?  

This is one of the points that should be discussed at the first
meeting of the Consortium.

If we go that way, I'll have to argue with my hierarchy, because they
already didn't like that much the different contribution levels in the
current agreement, but it doesn't look impossible.

Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr