[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Andrew Lawson <andrew@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Passing self to a new object |
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 06:02:07PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> From: Andrew Lawson <andrew@absentis.com>
>
> > I'm writing a gui program where the callback for a button
> > creates a new object (also a gui) and needs to pass it a reference to
> > itself in order that the new object can contact the original for
> > information. The classes look something like this;
> >
> > class xyz =
> > let top = ... in
> > let ... = ... in
> > object (self)
> > method btnNew = ... ~command:(fun () = new abc self) top in
> > ...
> > ...
> > end
> >
> > and abc (parent:xyz) =
> > object (self)
> > var myparent = parent
> > ...
> > end
> >
> >My error is;
> > .....
> > Self type cannot escape its class
>
> You've bumped into a painful quirk of ocaml's object system: self's
> type is not xyz, and must be handled with care.
Ouch, I knew that even such an otherwise nice language would turn
out to have some fuzzy bits someday :)
> (By the way, your program seemed strange, since you were using self
> and abc before defining them, but I suppose it was a copy error, and I
> corrected it.)
I admit this was a quick example of the problem, not the program
itself, which has many more hairy bits.
> The general solution to this is to first define a class type:
> class type xyz_t = object ('self)
> method
> btnNew : ...
> ...
> end
Well this gives me an excuse to start playing with types and
interfaces anyway. Is this a 'known problem, will be sorted
eventually' or a 'just live with it' sort of thing?
> Then change the code in btnNew to
> new abc (self :> xyz_t)
Casting! and here was I giving a C++ programmer some abuse
about this last week :)
> Remark that making xyz_t exact may be a bit lengthy, but you may leave
> out methods you don't need to call from abc.
Well, thats not so bad then ... I suppose good style should ahve
me doing this anyway.
> Hope this helps,
Most definitely
> Jacques Garrigue
Thanks very much
Andrew
--
Andrew Lawson
andrew@absentis.com
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr