Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr> writes:

> I wonder whether there are situations where it could be a problem?
> Sometimes, a missing semicolon can introduce typing errors or perhaps
> work with different semantics (what is very bad). But here, I don't
> see, since, generally, nobody add another statement after a "raise".
> Does anybody have an example?

well, mine was not a big deal, twas something like this:

  failwith "foo %s bar" (foo bar)

which of course should have been

  failwith (sprintf "foo %s bar" (foo bar))

it didn't take me long to understand what the pb was, but at runtime ;p
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr