Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
FFTW, Re: [Caml-list] Array Optimizations
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David McClain <barabh@q...>
Subject: Re: FFTW, Re: [Caml-list] Array Optimizations
It would be interesting to compare FFTW's performance with the library that
I use for paralellized 2-D and 1-D FFT's written by Intel for the Pentium
architecture. I just ran a test of this based on comparisons from the Clean
list where they showed implementations ranging from 2 sec to 7 sec on a Sun
750 MHz (64 bit?). I ran my 1024 x 1024 2-D FFT on a Pentium II 350 MHz
single CPU under Win/NT 4.0 (SP6) and got times around 1.17 sec. (estimates
for the Sun workstation would be approx 4x speedup).

- DM

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gurr" <gurr@mrs.med.ge.com>
To: <caml-list@inria.fr>; <barabh@qwest.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: FFTW, Re: [Caml-list] Array Optimizations


> The core of FFTW is a compiler written in Ocaml that generates
> C code.  It could be retargeted to gen Ocaml or Ocaml's intermediate
> language Cmm.  -D
> -------------------
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ:
http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives:
http://caml.inria.fr
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr