On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Sven wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 12:58:30AM -0500, Patrick M Doane wrote:
> > It's section 6. I extracted two sections from it (that I labeled 1 and 2).
>
> But apparently without reading it indepth, or at least understanding what it
> trully says.

Making assumptions like this is really inappropriate. I have read the LGPL
carefully in hopes that it would not be so restrictive.

I believe there is legitimate confusion in the license as to whether
object code is sufficient. Either way, including object code is still too
much to ask for.

Patrick

-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr