Browse thread
[Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Rogoff <bpr@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml |
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Xavier Leroy wrote: > > Yeah, this is a slightly misleading statement, unless the OCaml > > development team has made a modification to the LGPL similar to what was > > done for the Guile license, which is LGPL with one additional clause: > > blanket linking is allowed for Guile. (OCaml dev team, is this also the > > license under which the runtime exists?) > > We haven't yet modified the LGPL to remove these silly restrictions on > linking with LGPL code, but plan to do so in the near future. > > We'd be interested in examples of other software projects that did this. > You mention Guile, however it seems to be under the (standard) GPL > (not even LGPL). GNAT, www.gnat.com, also uses a modified standard GPL. They've been doing it for a while, and they even have commercial customers. Here's the whole damned thing -- -- This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under -- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software -- Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version. -- This software is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH -- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY -- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License -- for more details. Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite -- 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. -- -- As a special exception, if other files instantiate generics from this -- unit, or you link this unit with other files to produce an executable, -- this unit does not by itself cause the resulting executable to be -- covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception does not -- however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be -- covered by the GNU Public License. Why not just translate Ada jargon to OCaml and swipe this? -- Brian ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr