On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:25:23PM -0800, james woodyatt wrote:
> The two licenses that spring to mind most readily to me are the Artistic 
> License, and the Apple Public Source License.

But if you consider using these, you might want to take the FSF's
stance on these license into account:

Artistic:
  We cannot say that this is a free software license because it is too
  vague ... We urge you to avoid using it, except as part of the 
  disjunctive license of Perl.

APSL:
  Please don't use this license, and we urge you to avoid any software 
  that has been released under it.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#NonFreeSoftwareLicense

Yours, Florian
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr