Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2001-11-29 (08:49)
From: Florian Hars <florian@h...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:25:23PM -0800, james woodyatt wrote:
> The two licenses that spring to mind most readily to me are the Artistic 
> License, and the Apple Public Source License.

But if you consider using these, you might want to take the FSF's
stance on these license into account:

  We cannot say that this is a free software license because it is too
  vague ... We urge you to avoid using it, except as part of the 
  disjunctive license of Perl.

  Please don't use this license, and we urge you to avoid any software 
  that has been released under it.

Yours, Florian
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: