Archives of the Caml mailing list > Message from Daniel de Rauglaudre

Browse thread

Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml

John Field
- Xavier Leroy
  - Florian Hars
    - Daniel de Rauglaudre
      - Jérôme Marant
        
        Xavier Leroy
        
        Jérôme Marant
        
        Daniel de Rauglaudre
        
        Jérôme Marant
    - Xavier Leroy
  - Ronald Kuehn
  - proff@i...
    - Xavier Leroy
      - Xavier Leroy
        
        Jérôme Marant
      - Greg Bacon
        
        proff@i...
  - Sven

Date:	-- (:)
From:	Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@i...>
Subject:	Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:31:58AM +0100, Florian Hars wrote:

> Be careful, this requirement, at least in the way it is worded here,
> is in contradiction to the definition of free as used by the FSF and
> adopting a licence the implements it would make OCaml incompatible 
> with the GPL.

The point is the LGPL, not the GPL. We don't want the GPL to contaminate
users programs.

-- 
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr