Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Greg Bacon <gbacon@f...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
In message <>,
    Xavier Leroy writes:

: > The {L,}GPL is itself copyright, and not under the {L,GPL}, so you can't do
: > this.
: Don't pull my leg.  Of course, the copyright owner can say "this code
: is distributed under the conditions of the LGPL (quoted below in extenso),
: with the special exception that ...".
: Sheesh.  What next?  I can't shave because the FSF advocates beards?

For a well-known counterexample, the Perl Kit is distributed either
under the terms of the Artistic License or the GPL.

Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: