In message <20011129093210.A19619@pauillac.inria.fr>,
    Xavier Leroy writes:

: > The {L,}GPL is itself copyright, and not under the {L,GPL}, so you can't do
: > this.
: 
: Don't pull my leg.  Of course, the copyright owner can say "this code
: is distributed under the conditions of the LGPL (quoted below in extenso),
: with the special exception that ...".
: 
: Sheesh.  What next?  I can't shave because the FSF advocates beards?

For a well-known counterexample, the Perl Kit is distributed either
under the terms of the Artistic License or the GPL.

Greg
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr