Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Benchmark: ref update vs argument passing
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | malc <malc@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Benchmark: ref update vs argument passing |
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:11:27 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@cs.unibo.it> pisze: > > > Are these tests realistic or I am missing something? > > IMHO they are too small to draw generic conclusions. > > You can compile with 'ocamlopt -S' and see the assembler output. > This one looks yet better than use_arg (on Intel at least): > > let use_refs' time = > let rif = ref 0 in > for i = 0 to time - 1 do rif := !rif + 1 done; > !rif let use_refs' time = let rif = ref 0 in for i = 0 to pred time do incr rif done; !rif Sorry couldnt resist.. -- mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr