> Perhaps this should go to caml-bugs only, but I thought discussions
> on the list might disambiguate some assumptions I'm making.  Also
> I'm not sure it's a bug.  In the code below (section 1), everything
> seems to work fine.  The code compiles with no problems.  In the
> almost-identical code section 2, the compiler emits the following:
> 
> v/64
> >> Fatal error: Bytegen.comp_expr: var v_64
> Uncaught exception: Misc.Fatal_error

This is most certainly a bug in the compiler. "Fatal errors" are,
well, just that: internal inconsistencies in the compiler that should
never happen.

We will investigate, but it would have been preferable to submit a bug
report to caml-bugs@inria.fr: these get archived automatically and are
much harder for us to forget about :-)

- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr