Andreas Rossberg schrieb am Montag, den 19. November 2001:
> Maybe. I don't often use monads myself, so I am by no means an expert,
> but there are quite some useful applications, even outside the realm of
> lazy evaluation and purely functional languages. Examples are
> encapsulating state, failure, non-determinism, etc. I think Markus Mottl
> posted an OCaml example of a simple monadic evaluator some time ago.

Yes, you can get it here (called "IMP"):

  http://www.ai.univie.ac.at/~markus/home/ocaml_sources.html

It compares interpretation of a simple imperative language in monadic
style to explicit state passing. As was already mentioned, the lack of
overloading doesn't make monads as convenient as in Haskell.

Regards,
Markus Mottl

-- 
Markus Mottl                                             markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence                  http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr