Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Tom <tom7ca@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
> > >   1. you may also compile or link a "work that uses the Library" with the
> > >      Library to produce a work containing portions of the Library, and
> > >      distribute that work under terms of your choice, provided that the
> > >      terms permit modification of the work for the customer's own use and
> > >      reverse engineering for debugging such modifications.
> >
> Yes, I refer to that below - and it is in contradiction with this
> paragraph. It's not listed as an exception so I don't know what that means
> in legal terms. The most conservative answer is that I must do what can
> support both clauses - that is to provide source.

I believe in this case "supporting modifications" refers to letting end users
modify the binary; the way I understand it, it's not an obligation to provide


Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
Bug reports:  FAQ:
To unsubscribe, mail  Archives: