Browse thread
[Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Tom <tom7ca@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml |
> > > 1. you may also compile or link a "work that uses the Library" with the > > > Library to produce a work containing portions of the Library, and > > > distribute that work under terms of your choice, provided that the > > > terms permit modification of the work for the customer's own use and > > > reverse engineering for debugging such modifications. > > > Yes, I refer to that below - and it is in contradiction with this > paragraph. It's not listed as an exception so I don't know what that means > in legal terms. The most conservative answer is that I must do what can > support both clauses - that is to provide source. I believe in this case "supporting modifications" refers to letting end users modify the binary; the way I understand it, it's not an obligation to provide source. Tom. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr