Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Re: OCaml speed
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: complex bigarrays
> The biggest problem is that there is no OCaml build in type complex
> and that the Bigarray doesn't have complex too (sometime ago I read
> that someone was thinking about adding complex numbers to the
> Bigarray module, I would appreciate this very much).

Adding complex arrays to the Bigarray module is on my to-do list.

One issue is how these arrays should be represented to allow
no-copying exchange between C and Fortran.  My understanding is that
in C, arrays of complex are generally represented as arrays of pairs
of floats (or doubles), while in Fortran some codes use the C
representation (one array of pairs) while others use a pair of arrays.
The array-of-pairs representation fits well the Bigarray interface,
but the pair-of-arrays approach does not.  

Could someone with numerical experience in Fortran provide more
information on this?

- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr