Hi,

On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:05:15PM +0200, Lauri Alanko wrote:

> This seems like something where first-class continuations would be
> useful. Are there any plans on adding them to O'Caml? SML/NJ at least
> seems to have them.

This is feasible, I implemented them in Caml Light some years ago. But
in the implementaion of SML/NJ, continuations are "light" and natural
because their execution "stack" is implemented not by a stack but by a
list. To get the continuation, you has just to get the "stack pointer".
In OCaml, you should make a copy of the execution stack.

> If full continuations are too expensive, even upwards-only continuations
> would be a handy alternative to exceptions.

Why not using exceptions, then? Do you mean that you want to be able to
restart the same continuation several times?

-- 
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr