Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml |
Xavier Leroy wrote:
> This last claim seems to be an excessive simplification of what's in
> the LGPL. At any rate, I maintain that what I'm proposing ("this is
> distributed under the conditions of the LGPL with the special
> exception that ...") is perfectly OK. The GNAT project does exactly
Yes, you have perfectly the right to do that. Of course, the license
can no longer be called LGPL since it has been modified.
--
Jérôme Marant
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr